Current:Home > NewsPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -TradeWisdom
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-11 22:19:22
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (91928)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- 2024 relief pitcher rankings: Stable closers are back in vogue
- Beached sperm whale dies after beaching along Florida’s Gulf Coast
- Why Bad Bunny's 2024 Oscars Look Is So Unexpected
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Have you ever been called someone's 'moot'? The social media slang's meaning, unpacked
- Trevor Bauer dominates in pitching appearance vs. Los Angeles Dodgers minor leaguers
- Biggest moments from the 2024 Oscars, from Emma Stone's surprise win to naked John Cena
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Liza Koshy plays off her Oscars red carpet fall like a champ: 'I've got my ankles insured'
Ranking
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- When is Eid Al-Fitr? When does Ramadan end? Here's what to know for 2024
- Kamilla Cardoso embarrasses South Carolina but sting will be fleeting
- Demi Moore and Her Daughters Could Be Quadruplets at 2024 Oscars After-Party
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Kylie Jenner Stuns in New Sam Edelman Campaign: An Exclusive Behind the Scenes Look
- Emma Stone and Husband Dave McCary Share Kiss at Oscars Party in Rare PDA Moment
- Why Christina Applegate Is “Kind of in Hell” Amid Battle With Multiple Sclerosis
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Meg Ryan Stuns in Rare Red Carpet Moment at Vanity Fair 2024 Oscars After-Party
Who has the most Oscars of all time? Academy Awards records that made history
Lindsay Lohan Is So Fetch at Vanity Fair Oscars After-Party for First Time in Over a Decade
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
Ryan Gosling joined by Slash for epic, star-studded 'I'm Just Ken' Oscars performance
Full transcript of Face the Nation, March 10, 2024
Emma Stone was crying, locked out of Oscars during 3 major wins: What you didn't see on TV